Dear s! Please post bug reports about FDM here!

FDM 6 56354c

s: Alex 4wcb

Thiru

Re: FDM 6.3 ALPHA 5e6q40

Postby Thiru » Tue Aug 06, 2019 5:51 am

Forget to mention:
Browser used: Google Chrome v72
OS: Mac OS Mojave 10.14.5
Top
Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2947
ed: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Alex » Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:57 am

6.4.0 build 1805 is released.
Alex,
FDM development team
Top
Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2947
ed: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 6.2 ALPHA 5v4p2v

Alex » Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:39 pm

geralt2b wrote:Why cant i use the youtube function to get a 4k version link?
It up to 2K in most case. But I can use youtube-dl to get a 4k version link.
I hope I just miss setting out?

Hello,
Fixed. Thanks for the report!
By the way, currently it's not in the top of the list, you have to choose it manually somewhere in the middle of the list.
Alex,

FDM development team
Top
Bryan Z

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Postby Bryan Z » Fri Aug 16, 2019 12:58 pm

It used to be on Windows that you could send multiple request to Free Manager and then click on them one after the other setting the appropriate directory for each.

Currently if multiple are sent then when the final one is clicked on the others are lost. Can this capability be restored?
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

johnlgalt » Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:49 pm

Bryan Z wrote:It used to be on Windows that you could send multiple request to Free Manager and then click on them one after the other setting the appropriate directory for each.

Currently if multiple are sent then when the final one is clicked on the others are lost. Can this capability be restored?


This. I've had numerous issues with this in that the first DL is caught by FDM, but the second defaults to my browser, and subsequent are not caught by the FDM or browser. They really do disappear as Bryan said.

I'm still on 6.3 though - I'll give 6.4 a shot and see if it persists like that.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2947
ed: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Alex » Fri Aug 16, 2019 4:23 pm

Bryan Z wrote:It used to be on Windows that you could send multiple request to Free Manager and then click on them one after the other setting the appropriate directory for each.

Currently if multiple are sent then when the final one is clicked on the others are lost. Can this capability be restored?


Hello,
This is a bug. Thanks for the report!
Alex,

FDM development team
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

johnlgalt » Sun Aug 18, 2019 3:28 am

Something odd happens for me - and I've noticed this before, but don't if I made a big report.

ing Gentoo Linux files from the Oregon State University Open Source Lab (basically their FTP mirror for Gentoo) at https://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/amd6 ... /hardened/ ) and something strange happens.

In that list, if you pick any of the .ISO related files, FDM parses the name exactly as you see there. But if you pick any of the .tar.xz files, the ones ending with .tar.xz come out fine - but all of the others (.CONTENTS, .DIGESTS, and .DIGESTS.asc) end up with a .xz appended to them.

See this image for clarification:

Image

The file I tried to DL that time was the stage3-amd64-hardened-20190814T214502Z.tar.xz.CONTENTS and as you can see in the FDM popup dialog, it appended .xz

Windows 10 Pro X64 1903
FDM Beta version 6.4.1805 (fba80b3)
Browsers tested:
Firefox Nightly (currently at 70.0a1 (2019-08-17) (64-bit)) (tested on 2 different profiles)
Google Chrome Version 76.0.3809.100 (Official Build) (64-bit) (3 different profiles)
Microsoft Edge (Chromium) Version 78.0.249.0 (Official build) canary (64-bit)

Reproducible 100% of the time with any of those browsers, any profile (including a brand new one in Nightly).

FWIW, I'm using the context menu to select the file manually for FDM to DL (to preserve server time / date of the files).
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
 avatar
Usher
Posts: 2576
ed: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Usher » Sun Aug 18, 2019 3:54 pm

johnlgalt wrote:Something odd happens for me - and I've noticed this before, but don't if I made a big report.
(...)
The file I tried to DL that time was the stage3-amd64-hardened-20190814T214502Z.tar.xz.CONTENTS and as you can see in the FDM popup dialog, it appended .xz
It's all OK on the FDM side. It's just some server which forgot to set MIME type for those text files. You can check logs - the server es "Content-Type: application/x-xz", which is obviously improper for CONTENTS listing.

On the other side, If MIME type was set properly, the file on click would be opened in the browser…

However, FDM for Linux/Android should have option to keep filenames unchanged, without adding MIME type (extension) ed in "Content-Type" HTTP header field.

johnlgalt wrote:FWIW, I'm using the context menu to select the file manually for FDM to DL (to preserve server time / date of the files).
What is wrong with normal click - FDM grabs files from the browser cache without checking timestamps on server or what?
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM and forum
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Top
Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2947
ed: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Alex » Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:52 pm

johnlgalt wrote:But if you pick any of the .tar.xz files, the ones ending with .tar.xz come out fine - but all of the others (.CONTENTS, .DIGESTS, and .DIGESTS.asc) end up with a .xz appended to them.

Hello,
Thanks for the report! This will be fixed in the next update.
Alex,

FDM development team
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

johnlgalt » Mon Aug 19, 2019 12:19 am

Usher wrote:It's all OK on the FDM side. It's just some server which forgot to set MIME type for those text files. You can check logs - the server es "Content-Type: application/x-xz", which is obviously improper for CONTENTS listing.

On the other side, If MIME type was set properly, the file on click would be opened in the browser…

However, FDM for Linux/Android should have option to keep filenames unchanged, without adding MIME type (extension) ed in "Content-Type" HTTP header field.


Ahh, didn't think about the MIME type because the browser s it with the correct name.

Usher wrote:What is wrong with normal click - FDM grabs files from the browser cache without checking timestamps on server or what?


No, if I click normally on .CONTENTS / . DIGESTS / .DIGESTS.asc the browsres attempt to DL them directly - but obviously they then have the current DATETIME values.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
 avatar
Usher
Posts: 2576
ed: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Usher » Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:53 am

johnlgalt wrote:if I click normally on .CONTENTS / . DIGESTS / .DIGESTS.asc the browsres attempt to DL them directly
The browser starts ing because MIME type ed by the server isn't ed in the browser database.
However, in order to force ing, MIME type should be set to universal application/octet-stream value rather than to any type which can be associated with some specific extension (here xz compressed file) or application (xz utils, peazip or other archiver).
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM and forum
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Top
Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2947
ed: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Alex » Mon Aug 19, 2019 10:43 am

6.4 build 1819 is released.
Alex,

FDM development team
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

johnlgalt » Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:33 pm

Usher wrote:
johnlgalt wrote:if I click normally on .CONTENTS / . DIGESTS / .DIGESTS.asc the browsres attempt to DL them directly
The browser starts ing because MIME type ed by the server isn't ed in the browser database.
However, in order to force ing, MIME type should be set to universal application/octet-stream value rather than to any type which can be associated with some specific extension (here xz compressed file) or application (xz utils, peazip or other archiver).


That makes sense. And it explains why this happened across different browsers as well. Thanks, Usher.

Alex wrote:6.4 build 1819 is released.


ing it now.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
 avatar
Usher
Posts: 2576
ed: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

Usher » Tue Aug 20, 2019 7:25 pm

johnlgalt wrote:
Alex wrote:6.4 build 1819 is released.
ing it now.
Have you noticed that FDM for Linux is BETA? See the screenshot:
Image
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM and forum
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 6.4 ALPHA 5r532m

johnlgalt » Tue Aug 20, 2019 11:11 pm

Alex wrote:
Bryan Z wrote:It used to be on Windows that you could send multiple request to Free Manager and then click on them one after the other setting the appropriate directory for each.

Currently if multiple are sent then when the final one is clicked on the others are lost. Can this capability be restored?


Hello,
This is a bug. Thanks for the report!


Well, now it doesn't throw the N+1 DLs at the browser, it catches them - but any previously uned item disappears, so you can only DL the last one.

Windows 10 x64 Pro Insider Preview build 18963
Firefox nightly (currently 70.0a1 (2019-08-20) (64-bit))
FDM v6.4.0 [build 1819, Aug 19, 2019] ßeta
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top

Return to “General forum”

Who is online 2872f

s browsing this forum: No ed s and 13 guests

 

  506wm