Dear s! Please post bug reports about FDM here!

FDM 5.1 3n4q61

s: Alex 4wcb

Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2947
ed: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

Alex » Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:36 pm

Usher wrote:Why new FDM 5.1 builds are still provided with old Firefox WebExtension ver. 3.0.11? It may be a source of problems when updating to fdm_ffext2…

Hello,
New versions of FDM installs extensions from Mozilla(Chrome) extensions stores, i.e. from the Internet. The .xpi extension in the distributive is just a legacy component which is simply not removed yet. :)
Alex,
FDM development team
Top
 avatar
Usher
Posts: 2576
ed: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

Usher » Mon Dec 31, 2018 4:35 pm

I think that it would be better to add current extensions to new builds. That way FDM will be ready-to-use without any update needed.

And what about updating language files? Four pull requests stuck in the queue…
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM and forum
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Top
Alex
FDM Team
Posts: 2947
ed: Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:17 pm

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

Alex » Tue Jan 01, 2019 7:50 pm

Usher wrote:I think that it would be better to add current extensions to new builds. That way FDM will be ready-to-use without any update needed.


This can't be done. Installation from .XPI is not compatible with installation from Store. That's why .XPI will be removed.

Usher wrote:And what about updating language files? Four pull requests stuck in the queue…


Sorry, I can't answer this question. But, FDM6 is our main goal. It should kick both FDM3 and FDM5 (I hope). FDM6 does not language files currently. We plan to add this as soon as it gets mature.
Alex,

FDM development team
Top
 avatar
Usher
Posts: 2576
ed: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

Usher » Wed Jan 02, 2019 3:51 am

Alex wrote:
Usher wrote:I think that it would be better to add current extensions to new builds. That way FDM will be ready-to-use without any update needed.
This can't be done. Installation from .XPI is not compatible with installation from Store. That's why .XPI will be removed.
Now it's clear…

Alex wrote:
Usher wrote:And what about updating language files? Four pull requests stuck in the queue…
Sorry, I can't answer this question. But, FDM6 is our main goal. It should kick both FDM3 and FDM5 (I hope). FDM6 does not language files currently. We plan to add this as soon as it gets mature.
I'm talking about pull requests on Github. There are almost complete and of good quality translations for FDM 5.1 there. They should replace horrible automatic translation provided for unkown reasons (to make laugh or to be nominated to The Hall of Shame maybe?) by FDM team and they should be reused in FDM 6 in the future. If you add them now, other s will be able to add missing strings of translation and improve existing ones.

In any case you should NOT start translations in FDM 6 from the scratch again, it would be a plan for suicide. You DID it wrong in FDM 5.x, you should reuse translations from FDM 3.x instead. Automatic translations are so horrible or ridiculous that they should be immediately removed as severe errors.

Without good quality translations you are losing s and you will lose more and more s in the future… It's just a particular case of missing features. Many advanced s have already moved to other software as FDM 5.x doesn't provide features available in FDM 3.x and fixes from FDM 5.x aren't backported to FDM 3.x. Some s did report their dissatisfaction publicly also on this forum.
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM and forum
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Top
MIET
Posts: 7
ed: Fri Feb 02, 2018 3:38 pm

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

MIET » Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:10 pm

Hi

Queue feature please :(
FDM is the best manager and Queue is the only missing feature !
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

johnlgalt » Mon Jan 14, 2019 4:44 pm

Hi, devs,

Any idea on when the server time issue that started after version 6.1.34 build 6924 will be fixed?

I hate that I ma missing out on some of the newer features because this is a must-have feature for me....
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
Clive Sorensson
FDM Team
Posts: 1396
ed: Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:06 pm

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

Clive Sorensson » Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:55 am

johnlgalt wrote:Hi, devs,

Any idea on when the server time issue that started after version 6.1.34 build 6924 will be fixed?

I hate that I ma missing out on some of the newer features because this is a must-have feature for me....


I've repeatedly informed the devs about the complaints, they are aware of the problem, it's in the works.
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

johnlgalt » Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:28 pm

Clive Sorensson wrote:
johnlgalt wrote:Hi, devs,

Any idea on when the server time issue that started after version 6.1.34 build 6924 will be fixed?

I hate that I ma missing out on some of the newer features because this is a must-have feature for me....


I've repeatedly informed the devs about the complaints, they are aware of the problem, it's in the works.


Thanks, Clive, for keeping them on their respective toes :p
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
oroville
Posts: 30
ed: Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:41 pm

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

oroville » Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:06 pm

Where is v5.1.37 [build 7297]?
Top
 avatar
Usher
Posts: 2576
ed: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Poland

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

Usher » Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:14 am

In the right place (though unlisted for some time).
Andrzej P. Wozniak, FDM and forum
Read FDM FAQ and the reporting rules
"How to report a bug or a problem with FDM" before posting
Top
Spawn51
Posts: 1
ed: Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:31 am

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

Spawn51 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:45 am

Just tested FDM v5.1.37.7302 + FF v64.02 + ext v3.0.33, server time/date stamp bug fixed! :wink:
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

johnlgalt » Sat Jan 26, 2019 1:26 am

Yup - Alex has confirmed and says latest FDM 5.1 s server time - about to test myself.
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
johnlgalt
Posts: 484
ed: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: 3rd Rock
:

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

johnlgalt » Sat Jan 26, 2019 1:44 am

Just verified using a test .ISO from OSDN (CloneZilla 261 MB .ISO, link here if you want to test: https://osdn.net/projects/clonezilla/do ... amd64.iso/ )

Indeed, server time is working and now I can have my dark theme, to boot.

Thanks, devs!
__

I am I.

Please read the FDM FAQ and to report bugs follows the instructions in this post:
How to report bugs for FDM
Top
oroville
Posts: 30
ed: Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:41 pm

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

oroville » Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:28 pm

Disregard
Top
meitao0211
Posts: 2
ed: Tue Feb 26, 2019 6:04 am

Re: FDM 5.1 5o1h3c

meitao0211 » Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:11 am

I can't seeding, when I it, then restart fdm. The peers show that I have not ed the data and can't connect to anyone. Is this a bug?
https://imgchr.com/i/kTisqP
Top

Return to “General forum”

Who is online 2872f

s browsing this forum: No ed s and 5 guests

 

  506wm